Help get this topic noticed by sharing it on
Twitter,
Facebook, or email.
Twitter,
Facebook, or email.
Should more concepts be rewarded for Luster?
Your winning Quirky design for Luster doesn't have a lot of the features/materials that the final product has. Some of those items were submitted in other community member's submissions. Why weren't multiple winners chosen for the concept phase?
-
-
-
What Michael said above... Response time has taken a nose dive.
-
-
The design team does not award Concept winners until the final design has been chosen, specifically to reward the submissions which did add to that final design.
Please list the features/materials that you're referring to, and the submissions in question. -
-
Here is Q's chosen winner:
http://www.quirky.com/ideations/72396
Key features missing in final design not in this winning submission:
- No bristles for cleaning tires
- No pivoting head function
- No shag sponge/brush for washing the car
- No telescoping
- No stationary head (it removes for use and wand converts to hose nozzle)
The only thing it has in common with the final design is that it attaches to a hose and dispenses soap (pretty much the only thing in common with the submission design and every other design proposed).
Here are the designs I think have features not common with all others and were incorporates into the final design.
1. The only entry with a pivoting head for maneuverability.
http://www.quirky.com/ideations/72547
2. Interchangeable heads including bristles
http://www.quirky.com/ideations/72357
3. Features wheel bristles, stationary head, Micro Fiber shag brush head
http://www.quirky.com/ideations/73404- view 1 more comment
-
-
Any updates Shirley?
-
-
Hey Michael, I forwarded your points to QDS for re-review. Unless I hear otherwise from them, there won't be a change. I know this is a subjective process, but they are the judges of which submissions have added to the design process.
-
-
-
-
-
Loading Profile...


CHAMP
CHAMP

